Taxi drivers, they're all one and the same breed in every different country you visit. Perhaps it's the quota they have to meet or perhaps they push themselves too hard or perhaps there competition between taxi companies, the need to get the passengers, the need to get them to where they want fast.
In this country, taxi drivers seem to be able to choose where to bring you and not the other way around. Take for example, if you live in a remote residential area where everybody owns a car or some means of transportation, taxi drivers actually get to choose whether or not to ferry you back home. Why? Because they want to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. How? If they ferry you home, and don't get another passenger in return, that's diesel wasted travelling the extra distance, and diesel means money.
However, if you live in a popular district, where the taxi driver is certain to get a fare, then it's to and fro, double the income. It's sort of a way to maximise the amount of diesel with the number of passengers ferried. But is this any way to treat passengers? As it is, if we book a taxi through the phone, we have to pay a booking fee. Then there are peak hour charges, midnight charges, location charges etc, etc, etc the list just goes on and on and on and on.
Then there's the way they drive. Have you ever seen how taxi drivers drive? They will stop at absolutely nothing, cut in front of you no matter how small the space is, swerve in and out of lanes, just to cut the queue to get their passengers to their destinations on time. We who drive cars tend to think that this is an utterly despicable habit, but if you were the passenger in the taxi, you would thank the driver dearly for doing all those things to get you to work on time.
However, not all people take kindly to taxi drivers. Recently here a van driver got angry with a taxi driver for cutting into his lane that they had a heated discussion which ended up with him driving him running the taxi driver down and dragging his body for over 800 meters on a crowded street to try to dislodge him from his van. This sounds so much like what Achilles did to Hector in the Trojan war. Achilles killed Hector and dragged his body behind his chariot before the walls of Troy 3 times. Should we thus be turning to savages to take care of savages? Sounds a bit far-fetched, it's more likely an eye for an eye, but does it make it right?
Taxi drivers don't realise that driving dangerously and compromising safety gives them more problems than they realise. Look at it this way, if the taxi itself is involved in an accident due to reckless driving, then they can't pick up any more passengers. In this country, it's called a broken rice bowl. No passenger equates to no income, and at least a week's of regret.
However, not all taxi drivers are like savages. A handful of them have been known to be extra careful and very, very chatty and friendly when they pick you up. They go the extra mile to make your journey as a passenger enjoyable and it helps to make your day. I guess all it takes is 1 rotten apple in the basket to spoil the whole bunch. And at the same time, it is a mundane life they make chauffeuring passengers from point A to B to C, but it still doesn't give us the right to turn savage, after all, we're all making a living in different ways, aren't we?
Run them over? I think not, it's better to live and let live to fight another day.